Question _LOC

Part 1. 
I switched of the GEDCOM-L exensions, but I still see the menu Lists/Locations, which is used to enter data for the _LOC tag.
Why is Locations still visible.  AFAIK _LOC is only defined in GEDCOM-L and is not part of Standard GEDCOM 5.5.1.
Part 2.
In that context I could created a PLAC tag without a <Placename>. But that is defined as {Size=1:120}, so can not be empty!?
Part 3.
Should the PLACs placename be auto got from the _LOCs first NAME subtag. And furtheron the hierarchy level name from the first NAME of the hierarchy of the _LOCs.
Part 4.
Within the _LOC, you can have several NAME subtags, from which the first is used to identfy. The headline (title) for NAME is Place. Shouldn't  Place be changed to Name in that case?
 

> I switched of the GEDCOM-L exensions, but I still see the menu Lists/Locations, which is used to enter data for the _LOC tag.
Why is Locations still visible.

This option allows you to *create* GEDCOM-L extensions.

Existing non-standard GEDCOM will always be displayed.

fisharebest wrote:

> I switched of the GEDCOM-L exensions, but I still see the menu Lists/Locations, which is used to enter data for the _LOC tag.
Why is Locations still visible.

This option allows you to *create* GEDCOM-L extensions.

Existing non-standard GEDCOM will always be displayed.

Ok for part 1.
I see the menu Lists/Locations is disappearing, when there does not exist a _LOC tag within the GEDCOM.

Part 5.
When I attach a _LOC to the PLAC for example in a BIRT how should the visitor find the information from the _LOC? There seems to me to be no hint, that there exists a _LOC for the BIRT.

Edit:
 

 Presentation: