- Posts: 5
Question Easy way to copy sources
- Frunit
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
1. Enter birthday and add source(s) to it
2. Enter day of baptism and add source(s) to it
Usually (for me), the sources for birthday and baptism are the same. In my system, the source is the church book. Then, I add information about the page etc. to the details field and add a scan or picture of the page to the source -> media object. And then I repeat the very same steps for baptism, which is a lot of unnecessary repetition.
So, I wondered, if it were possible to add a functionality to all event editors that says something like "copy sources from...". When the user clicks on it, all registered events for that person are shown. When the user clicks on an event, all sources of the chosen event are copied to the current event.
The workflow could then be as following.
1. Enter birthday with all sources
2. Enter baptism, copy sources from birthday
3. Enter day of death with all sources
4. Enter day of funeral, copy sources from day of death
5. Enter Wedding with sources
6. Enter occupation, copy sources from wedding and death (choosing "copy sources from..." twice)
If this were to be implemented, I would go for copying all sources from an event. The alternative would be to allow the user to choose from multiple possible sources for a single event, but that makes it more clicks to add and a more complicated UI, since the user might want to add source 1 and 3, but not 2. If all sources were added, deleting an unrelated source is much easier (just click the "x").
I am aware that I could go into the gedcom source and copy the source block from one event to another, but this is error prone and kind of hacky.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3137
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frunit
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
Source citation: Ministerialbok for Hadsel prestegjeld 1849-1869
Citation details: Side 123, løpenr 120
Text: Some more details...
Media object: Ministerialbok for Hadsel prestegjeld 1849-1869 page 123
The first element, the source citation itself, I can quickly get from the drop-down. But the details, like page and running number, comments, or media objects (in this case a scan of the page) have to be copied manually (or chosen, in case of the media object).
My feature request is more a "quality of life" improvement that would save me a few seconds (or minutes) for each entry.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 3137
I agree that it would be nice, I’m not sure how that would be accomplished with the current page layout when the fact has more than one source citation.
I don’t run into this very often and I usually do large “same citation and fact” by copying the fact and if the fact is different (birth and death) I just copy the fact and change the “fact type” in GEDCOM.
By the way…. I think of the Source Record to include the Book Name that you have under the term “Source Citation”, but I would include the PAGE, TEXT and OBJE image of the page in the citation detail.
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jefferson49
- Offline
- Senior Member
I am aware that I could go into the gedcom source and copy the source block from one event to another, but this is error prone and kind of hacky.
That's what I am using a lot at the moment. After some time, I got quite used to it. However, I agree that it is a "hacking" approach that sometimes causes errors (which I detect with validation of my Gedcom exports).
if the fact is different (birth and death) I just copy the fact and change the “fact type” in GEDCOM.
I am also using the same workaround a lot. However, it also needs "hacking" in the Gedcom code of the facts.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jefferson49
- Offline
- Senior Member
Maybe, the existing "Merge records" editor could even be reused and extended with more features. These features could also be useful for the "Merge records" view itself.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- WGroleau
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2165
I haven't found it very error-prone. I select all the lines for 2 SOUR to (not including the next 2 or less, copy, and past in the other block. Seems simple, though it might be simpler if there were a "copy" icon next to each source in the details page.
That's what I am using a lot at the moment. After some time, I got quite used to it. However, I agree that it is a "hacking" approach that sometimes causes errors (which I detect with validation of my Gedcom exports).I am aware that I could go into the gedcom source and copy the source block from one event to another, but this is error prone and kind of hacky.
--
Wes Groleau
UniGen.us/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frunit
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
This could be a line that needs to be actively activated in the admin panel first.
If this is too much work for too little outcome, I'm fine with that. I can enter stuff twice or edit GEDCOM directly. (Although I really don't want to think about GEDCOM when working with trees. I want to work with people, relations, sources, etc. but not with (obscure) data formats). This is just a suggestion
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jefferson49
- Offline
- Senior Member
If a related setting in the control panel is activated, a copy icon is shown on the right hand side of each source citation. By clicking on the icon, the source citation can be copied to an internal clipboard. If a source citation is available in the clipboard, a source icon is shown in the edit area of all facts/events, which allow to use source citations. By clicking on the source icon, the source citation can be copied from the clipboard to the fact/event.
If this feature is used in parallel with the vesta modules, the lastest vesta version 2.1.17.0.4 needs to be installed. Many thanks to Richard as the module author to support this.
Additional note:
Already in earlier versions of the module, 2 further features were included, which can also support the handling of sources:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Frunit
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Sir Peter
- Offline
- Premium Member
- Posts: 506
Peter
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jefferson49
- Offline
- Senior Member
Copying source citations has been a nuisance to me for years. To tackle the root cause I have just created a GitHub issue to implement "reusable citations" at github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM/issues/348
Like!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- WGroleau
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2165
I think it’s a good idea, though I’m not likely to use it myself. I already use shared notes for repeating data, but if this were implemented, I’d likely convert some of those.Copying source citations has been a nuisance to me for years. To tackle the root cause I have just created a GitHub issue to implement "reusable citations" at github.com/FamilySearch/GEDCOM/issues/348
--
Wes Groleau
UniGen.us/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.