Idea "Botón" para la comunicación de modificaciones por parte de los visitantes.

En mi trabajo diario, he notado podría faltar una opción interesante.
Propongo añadir un botón en las páginas que permita a los visitantes sugerir cambios en los datos del contenido. Al hacer clic, se capturaría la pantalla o una imagen del «árbol interactivo» y se añadiría un cuestionario estándar. Este incluiría la identificación del informante, la modificación propuesta y su fuente. Esto facilitaría la verificación de información para el administrador y permitiría imprimir el correo para consultarlo en algún centro o biblioteca (y/o llevar un mejor control). Así tendríamos todos los cambios sugeridos siempre a mano.
Espero haber sido claro y estoy abierto a otras propuestas eficientes según vuestra experiencia. Gracias a todos.

There already is a link on the bottom of each page titled "For genealogy questions contact ..."

On my site with thousands of individuals indexed by search engines this is used only a couple of times per year. Do you have other experiences?

Do you think stating just "questions" puts people off that have corrections or additional data they want to have published?

I personally think that there should be the least of a barrier for visitors to give feedback. I would find a form which asks me for the source or data quite intimidating. It gets too "formal" to my taste.

bertkoor wrote:

There already is a link on the bottom of each page titled "For genealogy questions contact ..."

                                           Yes, but it is generally not used (except in very specific situations).

On my site with thousands of individuals indexed by search engines this is used only a couple of times per year. Do you have other
experiences?
                                     I do not receive many enquiries. However, when I am contacted by phone or email to point out possible errors based on their data, it takes me a long time to locate the individual, verify my own data and, in most cases, I have to request more information from the person reporting the error. Many rely on their own family trees and their entries come from oral transmissions, which further complicates the situation. In addition, over time, I may unintentionally forget the matter, making the person feel that I have forgotten their query. Therefore, I think that those interested should send their queries in writing, allowing me to follow them up more efficiently.

Do you think stating just "questions" puts people off that have corrections or additional data they want to have published?

                                      I think there shouldn't be many questions, just the essentials: name, email, date and a text box with the information. Whoever really wants to collaborate, would have no problem doing so.

I personally think that there should be the least of a barrier for visitors to give feedback. I would find a form which asks me for the source or data quite intimidating. It gets too "formal" to my taste.

                                    Yes, that is correct. But I wouldn't need a lot of data from you. I prefer to have a screenshot or the interactive tree for my control. Sometimes I leave the topic for checks and then I don't remember where I left off, which forces me to restart (age thing).