Question Red Labeling in Media
- jheiler
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Kind regards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
OBJE:FILE:TITL is correct
OBJE:FILE:FORM is correct
The FORM tag is generally use to describe the file format, [ bmp | gif | jpg | ole | pcx | tif | wav ]. I’m not sure what URL would indicate!
Where the TYPE tag would indicate [ audio | book | card | electronic | fiche | film | magazine |
manuscript | map | newspaper | photo | tombstone | video ]
Here are the the valid GEDCOM v5.5.1 tags.
n @XREF:OBJE@ OBJE
+1 FILE <MULTIMEDIA_FILE_REFN>
+2 FORM <MULTIMEDIA_FORMAT>
+3 TYPE <SOURCE_MEDIA_TYPE>
+2 TITL <DESCRIPTIVE_TITLE>
+1 REFN <USER_REFERENCE_NUMBER>
+2 TYPE <USER_REFERENCE_TYPE>
+1 RIN <AUTOMATED_RECORD_ID>
+1 <<NOTE_STRUCTURE>>
+1 <<SOURCE_CITATION>>
+1 <<CHANGE_DATE>>
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Benazzi
- Offline
- Junior Member
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hermann
- Offline
- Elite Member
www.familienbande-genealogie.de/en/tool.html#showmegedcom
Hermann
Designer of the custom module "Extended Family"
webtrees 2.1.19 (all custom modules installed, PHP 8.2, MariaDB 10.6) @ ahnen.hartenthaler.eu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jheiler
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Kind regards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hermann
- Offline
- Elite Member
Hermann
Designer of the custom module "Extended Family"
webtrees 2.1.19 (all custom modules installed, PHP 8.2, MariaDB 10.6) @ ahnen.hartenthaler.eu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fisharebest
- Offline
- Administrator
Is there a tool to identify these incorrect labels? I've tried "check for errors" and "data fixes" but there is not an option to do this.
"Check for errors" will find this.
Greg Roach - greg@subaqua.co.uk - @fisharebest@phpc.social - fisharebest.webtrees.net
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jheiler
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Kind regards
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fisharebest
- Offline
- Administrator
Here is an example of it working.
If you say it does not find this error for you, then can you post your GEDCOM data so that we can see it.
Greg Roach - greg@subaqua.co.uk - @fisharebest@phpc.social - fisharebest.webtrees.net
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Benazzi
- Offline
- Junior Member
1 PHON 1234567890
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
Edited:
If you received a red 1 PHON then this is in error. phone numbers are subtags to event/fact and therefore should be at level 2.
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
The GEDCOM Standard v5.5.1 indicates for Individual_Records that phone numbers are subtags to all events and facts. Fact/Event tags are at level 1 in the structure therefore phone numbers would be at level 2.
A red 1 PHON would be are error for an individual!
Many genealogy programs do not understand the GEDCOM Standard and therefore want to make the phone number a fact which it is not.
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Benazzi
- Offline
- Junior Member
A red 1 PHON would be are error for an individual!
Yep, but this is not the point that we discussing after some posts. We are discussing why this error was not identified by "check for errors" feature.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
This reads to me that it was marked as red. Was it not caught as in error for an individual. I’m confused in your statement. Where is this tag, can you supply the GEDCOM with surrounding tags as well?I've the telephone register red labeled:
1 PHON 1234567890
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hermann
- Offline
- Elite Member
- A record ("1 PHON") is labeled in red in the user interface, which indicates an error. This is ok, because the level 1 is not correct.
- The admin function "Check for errors" should find this (based on a remark of Greg). But this function doesn't find this error. This is the issue.
Edit:
Maybe the problem behind is: 2.0 versus 2.1. We are here in the 2.0 forum thread. The function of "Check for errors" was changed in 2.1!
Edit 2:
The forum thread "Help for version 2.0" has an extra line "Queries and requests for help about webtrees 2.1". This is wrong! It should be "... about webtrees 2.0".
Hermann
Designer of the custom module "Extended Family"
webtrees 2.1.19 (all custom modules installed, PHP 8.2, MariaDB 10.6) @ ahnen.hartenthaler.eu
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
Because this thread started out as a question about the color of the display in the user interface and was later changed to a discussion about the “check for error” function we have become confused.
A new thread should be opened to discuss the workings of the “check for errors” function and any potential differences between v2.0 and v2.1 since major changes may have occurred between the two checks!
EDIT
I personally don’t use “check for errors” because I know them by heart
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Benazzi
- Offline
- Junior Member
Hermann resumed perfectly. I may include that this tag is problably created in older version of webtrees (even in phpgedview. Yes, I'm a old user this software ). I only manage my reasearch using my website, more than 15 years.
And as Hermann said too, this is an error in 2.0 version. I'm waiting some modules be updated to use 2.1 version.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- norwegian_sardines
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2993
Ken
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jheiler
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
In my case "check for errors" did not find the not GEDCOM-compliant data.
Kind regards
Now I updated WT on version 2.1 and see dozens of remarks in the check.
I am confused.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.